logo logo
  • Bản tin
  • News
    Highlight

    "G2 Summit" between the U.S. and China: the Beginning of a New World Order or a Political Trap?

    16/11/2025
    • Hot Takes
    • Weekly News
  • Commentaries
    Highlight
    Viet Nam's baseline in the Gulf of Tonkin: an Overview and a Commentary

    Viet Nam's baseline in the Gulf of Tonkin: an Overview and a Commentary

    05/03/2025
    • Vietnamese Publications
    • International Publications 
  • Events
    Highlight
    The 16th South China Sea International Conference

    The 16th South China Sea International Conference

    01/11/2024
    • South China Sea International Conference
    • Ocean Dialogues
    • Other Events
  • Library
    Highlight
    Shipbuilding Policy under the Trump 2.0 Administration: Implications for Vietnam

    Shipbuilding Policy under the Trump 2.0 Administration: Implications for Vietnam

    05/12/2025
    • Map
    • Archives
    • Special Publications
  • Podcasts
    Highlight
    FROM THE SEA Ep 6 | The Philippines' Transparency Campaign in the SCS (w. Charmaine Willoughby)

    FROM THE SEA Ep 6 | The Philippines' Transparency Campaign in the SCS (w. Charmaine Willoughby)

    19/07/2024
  • Guide to Submission
    Highlight
    Guidelines for Submission to SCS Studies

    Guidelines for Submission to SCS Studies

    09/08/2024

Vietnamese Publications

Highlight

A counterargument to Xinhua’s Institute report on history of South China Sea: History distorted, law perverted

Recently, the Xinhua Institute (under China’s Xinhua News Agency) released a 33-page report titled “Historical and Legal Basis of China's Territorial Sovereignty and Maritime Rights in the South China Sea.” Xinhua Institute claims that this is a “comprehensive historical-legal assessment” intended to reinforce China’s positions in the South China Sea. However, beneath its veneer of “scholarship,” the document is fundamentally a political product, filled with historical sophistry and arbitrary interpretations and applications of the law. This article examines the report’s approach and key arguments, assessing its methodology as well as the legal reasoning and historical evidence it employs. Despite our attempts to “separate fact from fiction,” the 33-page document offers little that is substantively new beyond reiterating “post-World War II world order” arguments. Most of the content in this “so-called report” follows a well-worn path, recycling “time-worn” narratives in an attempt to justify...

05/12/2025
Sự kiện cũ Sự kiến sắp tới


China's Nature Reserve at Scarborough Shoal: Purpose, Predictions and Impacts

05/12/2025

The Dynamics of Japan-U.S. Relations: Strategic Autonomy or Strategic Dependence?

05/12/2025

The South China Sea in 2025: Dead Calm or Surging Undertow?

30/11/2025

The 2023-2025 Red Sea Crisis and Implications for the Indo-Pacific

05/10/2025

International Law and Critical Infrastructure: The Merits and the Gaps

16/09/2025

How International Law Addresses Piracy and Current Limits

27/08/2025

UNCLOS’ Values and Viet Nam’s National Interests after 30

09/07/2025

Deep-Sea Mining and the United States’ Seabed Strategy under Trump 2.0

12/05/2025

An assessment of Cambodia-US Relations under the Trump Administrations

25/03/2025

50 Days of Trump: The South China Sea in the United States’ Foreign Policy

15/03/2025

Viet Nam's baseline in the Gulf of Tonkin: an Overview and a Commentary

05/03/2025

Deep Seek and the South China Sea: From Controversy to Policy Adversity

28/02/2025
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • ...
  • 8
logo
  • About Us
  • Sitemap
  • Terms of Use
  • Contact Us
  • Help
  • Subscriptions
Keep updated