02/02/2012
The Duty to Cooperate in Semi-Enclosed Seas The South China Sea is a semi-enclosed sea governed by Part IX of the Law of the Sea Convention,[1] which says in Article 123 that countries bordering such seas “should co-operate with each other in the exercise of their rights and the performance of their duties under this Convention” More specifically, they are instructed to “endeavor, directly or through an appropriate regional organization (a) to co-ordinate the management, conservation, exploration, and exploitation of the living resources of the sea” and also to co-ordinate their activities “with respect to the protection and preservation of the marine environment.” The countries bordering on the South China Sea have failed to create an effective regional organization, and their cooperation “directly” has been generally unsuccessful as well. The Coordinating Body on the Seas of East Asia (COBSEA) has been mostly dysfunctional and the Partnerships in Environmental Management for the Seas of East Asia (PEMSEA)has been modest in its accomplishments. No effective organization to manage the shared fisheries has been established.
The UNEP Regional Seas Programmes
The UNEP Regional Seas Programme was launched in 1974 and currently consists of 13 regional programmes,[2] six of which are administered directly by UNEP,[3] and it has links to five “partner” regional environmental bodies.[4] These programmes emerged from the recognition that ocean regions differ dramatically and that unique ecosystems require individual conservation approaches, but it has also been recognized that many sources of marine pollution are global in nature and frequently uniform global standards and approaches are needed.[5]Although some of these programs have thrived, others have stumbled because of a lack of interest, political disputes, mission uncertainty, and modest funding. The goal of these programs has also been questioned, because they were established with a single-sector focus on pollution, and today attention is given to multi-sector, integrated coastal and ocean management strategies.[6]
The regional seas programmes have been considered to be "brown" organizations because of their focus on pollution, in contrast to the modern "green" approach that examines all aspects of ocean areas through integrated ecosystem management. Should it be recognized that a new approach is needed for the regional seas programmes, and that organizations with a more holistic and integrated approach, and that address resource as well as pollution issues, should be developed to provide proper governance of ocean and coastal areas?
(continuing)
Read full text of this paper here
[1] United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Dec. 10, 1982, Montego Bay, Jamaica, 1833 U.N.T.S. 397, 2 I.L.M. 1261 (1982), entered into force on Nov. 16, 1994.
[2] Black Sea, Wider Caribbean, East Asian Seas-COBSEA, Eastern Africa, South Asian Seas, Persian/Arab Gulf-ROPME Sea Area, Mediterranean, Northeast Pacific, Northwest Pacific-NOWPAP, Red Sea and Gulf of Aden, Southeast Pacific, Pacific-SPREP, and Western Africa.
[3] Wider Caribbean, East Asian Seas, Eastern Africa, Mediterranean, Northwest Pacific-NOWPAP, and Western Africa.
[4] Antarctic, Arctic, Baltic Sea, Caspian Sea, and Northeast Atlantic-OSPAR.
[5] See for example, J.G.B Derraik, The Pollution of the Marine Environment by Plastic Debris: A Review, 44:9 Marine Pollution Bulletin 842 (Sept. 2002); M.S. Islam and M. Tanaka, Impacts of Pollution on Coastal and Marine Ecosystems including Coastal and Marine Fisheries and Approach for Management: A Review and Synthesis, 48:7-8 Marine Pollution Bulletin 624 (April 2004); and D.A. Holdway, The Acute and Chronic Effects of Wastes Associated with Offshore Oil and Gas Production on Temperate and Tropical Marine Ecological Processes, 44:3 Marine Pollution Bulletin 185 (March 2002).
[6]See, e.g., BilianaCicin-Sain& Robert Knecht, Integrated Coastal and Ocean Management: Concepts and Practices (Island Press, 1998).
To stimulate South China Sea regional security cooperation in the control of piratical attacks against ships, this paper proposes the establishment of a limited purpose maritime and air defence identification zone over the South China Sea.
The Philippines recently passed a 2009 Baselines Law that, it was hoped, would finally confront its long-standing dilemma on whether to abandon its 1898 “treaty lines” altogether and adopt the modern rules on the Law of the Sea. That hope did not come to pass.
Abstract The interplay of power and law in the South China Sea is not well understood. To analyze the disputes over navigation rights, sovereignty to islands, and delimitation of maritime zones we need to grasp how states define and defend their geopolitical interests as well as the ways in which...
Introduction Much of the legal discussion about the ongoing situation in the South China Sea focuses upon the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS)[1], a convention that was concluded in 1982. During that early 1980's timeframe, there was an iconic television commercial[2] in...
Since 1999, China has enacted an annual fishing ban for two or three months in the summer in the North-Western part of the South China Sea. This year (2011), the ban took place from May 16th to August the 1st and in an area between the latitude 12° North to the North and longitude 113° East to the West.[1]Any...
The disputes in the South China Sea could be categorized into two parts: one is on the sovereignty of those island features, and the other is the maritime zones that could be claimed. It is understandable that the best way to solve the disputes might be delimiting boundaries so that the areas of sovereignty...